Quoting%20commentary for Bava Metzia 112:1
קדשים שהוא חייב באחריותן יש להן אונאה ושאינו חייב באחריותן אין להן אונאה רבי יהודה אומר אף המוכר ס"ת בהמה ומרגלית אין להם אונאה אמרו לו לא אמרו אלא את אלו:
SACRIFICES<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'sacred objects.' ');"><sup>1</sup></span> FOR WHICH ONE [THE OWNER] BEARS RESPONSIBILITY ARE SUBJECT TO [THE LAW OF] OVERREACHING; THOSE FOR WHICH ONE BEARS NO RESPONSIBILITY ARE NOT SUBJECT THERETO.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If one declares, 'Behold, I vow to offer a sacrifice', and then dedicates an animal in fulfilment of his vow, he is responsible for it, and should it receive a blemish or be stolen he must replace it by another, since his vow did not specify that particular animal. R. Simeon therefore regards it as his, i.e., secular property, hence subject to the law of overreaching. But if he declares, 'I vow to sacrifice this animal,' and it is subsequently lost or stolen, he has no further responsibility in the matter. Consequently it is already sacred property, and as such not subject to the law of overreaching. ');"><sup>2</sup></span>
Explore quoting%20commentary for Bava Metzia 112:1. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.